laspeedcameras.org · the other cities
California speed cameras, city by city
Seven cities may run speed cameras under two state laws, all on a pilot that ends January 1, 2032. Two are fining drivers, two are sending warnings, and three are still being installed or waiting on a date. Here is where each one stands, with what the first two found.
7 cities
241 camera locations allowed
2 fining now
5 run by Verra Mobility
San Francisco
Fining since Aug 5, 2025
Oakland
Fining since Mar 15, 2026
Long Beach
Sending warnings since Oct 7
Los Angeles
Sending warnings since Oct 26
Malibu
Testing warnings due in Nov
San Jose
Being installed warnings Dec 14
Glendale
No date 9 sites planned
Status as of October 30, 2026, from the latest city or press report named under each city. Counts are camera locations; several cities put two cameras at each location.
City by city
Where each city stands
San Francisco
Fining since Aug 5, 2025
- Locations
- 33 (56 cameras). State law caps the city at 33.
- Warnings began
- March 2025, the first city in the state
- Fines began
- August 5, 2025
- Vendor
- Verra Mobility
- Tickets so far
- More than 163,900 citations and 553,600 warnings through the end of March 2026
- Result
- Speeding 10 mph or more over the limit is down 84% at camera locations, 18 months in
August 2025 alone produced 16,555 citations, about 500 a day, billed at more than $1.2 million with $600,000 collected by early October. After one notice, 63% of drivers have not had a second. Walk SF counted half of the early tickets at more than 15 mph over.
Sources: SFMTA, Oct 16, 2026 · KQED, Apr 29, 2026 · ABC7, Oct 5, 2025 · SF.gov, Aug 4, 2025
Oakland
Fining since Mar 15, 2026
- Locations
- 18 (35 cameras), all on the city's high injury network
- Warnings began
- January 14, 2026
- Fines began
- March 15, 2026
- Vendor
- Verra Mobility
- Tickets so far
- 193,508 citations in the first four months of fines (March 15 to July 15), plus 332,816 warnings since January 14
- Result
- Vehicles 11 mph or more over are down 70% on average across the 18 locations; the 85th percentile speed fell 3 mph
Violations go to about 1.5% of the vehicles that pass a camera, and the violators average 14 mph over. 58% of citations went to registered owners outside Oakland. The busiest camera, 73rd Avenue between Fresno and Krause southbound, averaged 253 violations a day. Daily violations fell 26% between the first and fourth month of fines.
Sources: City of Oakland six-month report, Aug 2026 · KQED, Aug 20, 2026 · City of Oakland, Mar 13, 2026
Long Beach
Sending warnings since Oct 7, 2026
- Locations
- 18 planned, two per council district; 16 installed on October 7 with two to come
- Warnings began
- October 7, 2026, through December 7
- Fines begin
- After December 7, 2026
- Vendor
- Verra Mobility
- Why
- 53 fatal crashes in 2025, the most in more than a decade; 38 so far in 2026
Half of the cameras are on streets with the most deadly or severe crashes; the other half are in school zones or where street racing happens. The city projects about $5 million a year in tickets, half for running the program and half for street safety fixes. A new state law lets Long Beach add two cameras on Pacific Coast Highway from January 1, 2027.
Sources: Long Beach Post, Oct 7, 2026 · City News Service, Oct 7, 2026 · Hoodline, Oct 7, 2026
Los Angeles
Sending warnings since Oct 26, 2026
- Locations
- 125, the most of any city; 26 sending warnings and 99 being installed as of October 28
- Warnings began
- October 26, 2026, as each camera switches on
- Fines begin
- About December 25, 2026, 60 days after the first cameras
- Vendor
- Verra Mobility, $4,450 per camera per month, not to exceed $38,375,000 through January 1, 2032
- Where to look
- The map, with the posted limit and the speed that gets a ticket at every camera, and who gets the money
LA ran red-light cameras until July 2011 and ended them after a Controller audit found a net loss and that only 23% of fines were collected. This program's contract requires full cost recovery each year.
Sources: laspeedcameras.org, built from LADOT's camera layer and district lists · Council file 26-0707, LADOT report, May 8, 2026
Malibu (Pacific Coast Highway)
Testing, warnings due in November
- Locations
- 5, up to 10 cameras, on 21 miles of PCH: Decker Canyon, Guernsey to Morning View, Latigo Canyon, Carbon Beach Terrace to Carbon Canyon, Tuna Canyon
- Law
- SB 1297, signed September 27, 2024, a separate bill for this one highway
- Warnings begin
- November 2026, pushed back from late September while a traffic study on the eastern sites finishes
- Fines begin
- After the 60-day warning period, so likely January 2027
- Vendor
- Not named in the reports read
In a nine-day test from September 16 to 24, four cameras recorded about 100,000 speeding violations, 86% of them in eastern Malibu. The bill followed the October 17, 2023 crash that killed four Pepperdine students; more than 60 people have died on Malibu's PCH since 2010.
Sources: LAist, Oct 4, 2026 · Patch, Oct 1, 2026 · Malibu Times, Aug 21, 2026
San Jose
Being installed, warnings Dec 14
- Locations
- 33, two cameras each, at least one per council district; 4 installed as of October 23
- Warnings begin
- December 14, 2026
- Fines begin
- February 12, 2027
- Vendor
- Verra Mobility; the city estimates $15.4 to $17.9 million to install and run over five years
- Why
- 41 traffic deaths so far in 2026, down from 65 in 2022
The program waited on an $8.5 million federal grant that was withheld, so the city paid from local revenue. Only the rear plate is captured; images are deleted within five days if no violation is issued.
Sources: KQED, Oct 23, 2026 · KALW, Oct 27, 2026
Glendale
No start date announced
- Locations
- 9, chosen from 16 candidates, on Glendale Avenue, Brand, Glenoaks, San Fernando Road, Central and Chevy Chase
- Contract
- Council approved a vendor contract on December 16, 2025; the vendor is not named on the city page
- City schedule
- Warnings in mid-2026, then fines after 60 days. That date passed without an announcement.
- Status
- Patch asked the city in October and called it unclear
Sources: City of Glendale program page · Patch, Oct 2, 2026 · Crescenta Valley Weekly, Feb 5, 2026
Scale
What those rates would mean at 125 cameras
This is arithmetic on the two cities' published counts, not a forecast. LA's limits, streets and drivers differ, and both cities' rates fell month by month.
| City | Citations | Days | Locations | Per location per day | LA at that rate, per day |
| San Francisco, Aug 5, 2025 to Mar 31, 2026 | 163,900 | 239 | 33 | | |
| Oakland, Mar 15 to Jul 15, 2026 | 193,508 | 122 | 18 | | |
San Francisco's count is "more than 163,900" (KQED, Apr 29, 2026). Oakland's is the city's own six-month report. Oakland's rate is higher partly because its cameras sit on the city's highest-injury streets and partly because Oakland's first four months were busier than San Francisco's average over eight. The Who profits page uses a slider for this, so either rate can be tried there.